Research Methodology
Teacher is the most
important school-related factor affecting students’ achievement. In now day’s
school environment, the society expected teacher to be the key to open into
their children success. The
purpose of the research is to study the teachers’ self-efficacy and classroom management
beliefs relate with difficulties for teachers in their school activities in
order to assure that the classroom is managed well and effectively. The study
is attempt to answer the following research question:
1.
Is there any significant difference
between male and female teacher with regard to their
self-efficacy and classroom management beliefs?
2.
Is there any significant difference
among teachers who graduated from different types of secondary schools with
regard to their self-efficacy and classroom management beliefs?
3.2 Research Design
In
this study, the researcher uses a quantitative approach in the research design.
A survey research is conducted in this study. The survey design is used to
collect data form a sample consisting 100 teachers. The participants in this
study were a certified teacher from both genders male and female that has been
selected randomly. The population of this study is consisted of 4 schools which
are located at Petaling Utama district.
In addition, the
instrument used in this study is Teachers’
Sense of Efficacy Scale which adapted
from Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2001). The scale consisted of 27 closed-ended
questions.. A survey questionnaire is developed by the researcher that consisted 2-part which are the
demographic data and 27 closed-ended questions that derived from Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy
Scale.
from Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2001). The scale consisted of 27 closed-ended
questions.. A survey questionnaire is developed by the researcher that consisted 2-part which are the
demographic data and 27 closed-ended questions that derived from Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy
Scale.
For this study, the validity is assured
because the instruments used are adapted from the verified
instruments which are Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy Scale. In order to maintain the reliability, the
Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy Scale is used for the purpose of this study and the data were collected
from each participant. Therefore, the reliability of this study is said to be established.
instruments which are Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy Scale. In order to maintain the reliability, the
Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy Scale is used for the purpose of this study and the data were collected
from each participant. Therefore, the reliability of this study is said to be established.
Along the process of collecting data, the
information is collected through a set of closed-ended
questionnaires which are distributed to 4 schools in Petaling Jaya. The participants in this study are
chosen randomly and all of them are given time frame to answer the survey form. After the survey
form is collected, the researcher uses Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) to analyze data.
In order to test the hypothesis of this study, the mean scores for the subscales on the 27 closed-ended
questions on the Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy Scale is calculated. The researcher then conducted an
independent t-test to gain the statistically significant difference in these scores (p<0.5).
questionnaires which are distributed to 4 schools in Petaling Jaya. The participants in this study are
chosen randomly and all of them are given time frame to answer the survey form. After the survey
form is collected, the researcher uses Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) to analyze data.
In order to test the hypothesis of this study, the mean scores for the subscales on the 27 closed-ended
questions on the Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy Scale is calculated. The researcher then conducted an
independent t-test to gain the statistically significant difference in these scores (p<0.5).
Questionnaires
SECTION
A – DEMOGRAPHIC DATA
Please write your choice and ( √ ) in the
corresponding space provided.
1.
Age: (Please √ )
21
– 30
|
|
31 – 40
|
|
41 – 50
|
|
Above 50
|
2.
Gender: Female Male
3.
Higher Educational
Level
Diploma
|
|
Bachelor Degree
|
|
Masters
|
|
PHD
|
4.
Year of Teaching
1 – 5 years
|
|
6 – 15 years
|
|
16 – 20 years
|
|
More than 20 years
|
5.
Position at School
Administrator
|
|
Head of Panel
|
|
Excellent Teacher
|
|
Subject Teacher
|
This
questionnaire is designed to help us gain a better understanding of the kinds
of things that create
difficulties for teachers in their school activities. Please indicate your opinion about each of the
statements below. Your answers are confidential.
difficulties for teachers in their school activities. Please indicate your opinion about each of the
statements below. Your answers are confidential.
HOW MUCH CAN YOU
DO?
1 2
3 4 5 6 7
8 9
Nothing Very some quite a
great deal
Little influence a
bit
1. How much can you do to get through to the
most difficult students?
2. How much can you do to help your students
think critically?
3. How much can you do to control disruptive
behavior in the classroom?
4. How much can you do to motivate students
who show low interest in school work?
5. To what extent can you make your
expectations clear about student behavior?
6. How much can you do to get students to
believe they can do well in school work?
7. How well can you respond to difficult
questions from your students ?
8. How well can you establish routines to keep
activities running smoothly?
9. How much can you do to help your students
value learning?
10. How much can you gauge student
comprehension of what you have taught?
11. To what extent can you craft good
questions for your students?
12. How much can you do to foster student creativity?
13. How much can you do to get children to
follow classroom rules?
14. How much can you do to improve the
understanding of a student who is failing?
15. How much can you do to calm a student who
is disruptive or noisy?
16. How well can you establish a classroom
management system with each group of students?
17. How much can you do to adjust your lessons
to the proper level for individual students?
18. How much can you use a variety of
assessment strategies?
19. How well can you keep a few problem
students form ruining an entire lesson?
20. To what extent can you provide an
alternative explanation or example when students are confused?
21. How well can you respond to defiant
students?
22. How much can you assist families in
helping their children do well in school?
23. How well can you implement alternative
strategies in your classroom?
24. How well can you provide appropriate
challenges for very capable students?
25. How
much can you influence the decisions that are made in the school?
26. How much can you express
your views freely on important school matters?
27. How much can you do to
get the instructional materials and equipment you need?
|
1 2
3 4 5
6 7 8
9
1 2
3 4 5
6 7 8 9
1 2
3 4 5
6 7 8
9
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 2
3 4 5
6 7 8
9
1 2
3 4 5
6 7 8 9
1 2
3 4 5
6 7 8
9
1 2
3 4 5
6 7 8
9
1 2
3 4 5
6 7 8
9
1 2
3 4 5
6 7 8
9
1 2
3 4 5
6 7 8
9
1 2
3 4 5
6 7 8
9
1 2
3 4 5
6 7 8
9
1 2
3 4 5
6 7 8
9
1 2
3 4 5
6 7 8
9
1 2
3 4 5
6 7 8
9
1 2
3 4 5
6 7 8
9
|
References
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy,
A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing and
elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783-805.
http://works.bepress.com/nicole_mills/27